End Frustration with Women By Using the 2 Strike Rule
In my relatively short time here I’ve noticed one thing that comes up time and time again on this board – the concept of how many chances you should give a girl before you use her phone number as kindling for your fireplace. So here you go – Amlothi’s Investment Strategy for Women – free of charge to all of you on this awesome site. We all know that women don’t like to say no. This is why we can often get lots of phone numbers face to face, but later on you can’t get to that first date plateau. I’m not going to go into the reasons why this happens, suffice to say that it is a rare occasion when you will hear a straightforward “No”. My favorite excuse was And I have to pack If you reach the 3 strike mark, no matter what the situation, that slip of paper with her number on it gets turned to ash. Now, some of you might think that these rules are a bit harsh maybe some of you will think they are a bit lax?
Two Strikes Rule Dating
Here is where he struck out; strike one was for being an strike late even after I told him that was unacceptable. Strike two was for spending more weekends playing golf with his buddies or going to tournaments. This lasted about three months but probably should have ended after about six weeks with the three strikes rule.
our knowledge of the detail and impact of the ‘two-strikes rule’, which is referenced in the green paper. The green paper states that ‘To date.
This rule will apply to remuneration votes after 1 July this year for more commencement details, see below. The Act also:. If the spill motion receives a simple majority, the company will, within 90 days, have to hold a general meeting to vote on whether to keep the existing directors. A managing director will not be subject to the spill motion . Shareholders will be able to put forward their own nominees for consideration at that spill meeting. The legislation says that the statutory vacancies are filled by those directors who received the highest number of votes even if they didn’t receive enough votes to be formally elected.
This means that the notice of meeting, proxy forms, etc will have to make provision for voting on a spill motion.
Two Strikes rule starts today
John walked into the room with a glum expression on his face. He was always on the make but rarely successful. The last time she said there was something she wanted to watch on TV. Or maybe she was making someone jealous. I saw the hangdog look on his face and took pity on him. The next time you decide to ask a girl out, you give her three chances to say yes.
Rule that gives you follow rules and life. That’s a conversation with the national football league over a marriage here are your first date to meet.
Much has been written about the executive pay debate and the new two-strikes rule that gives shareholders more power to rein in remuneration. Less considered is the rule’s effectiveness in its first application in the recently concluded annual general meeting season, and what it means for companies that had a strike against their remuneration report and could face a board spill next year. Shareholders of listed companies now have to vote on whether to spill all board positions if 25 per cent or more votes cast are not in favour of adopting the remuneration report at two successive AGMs.
A spill resolution must then be put to a vote at the second AGM and if passed with 50 per cent or more of eligible votes cast, requires a spill meeting within 90 days to elect directors. That figure is down from a three-year average of about 14 per cent, had the rule been hypothetically in force from to In raw figures, only a small number of ASX companies received a strike against their remuneration report. Politicians and some investor groups claim this is evidence of the two-strikes rule’s effectiveness.
That is partly true. Certainly, there is evidence some boards of ASX companies, especially those with more contentious remuneration policies, made extra effort to communicate their position on executive pay matters to superannuation funds, fund managers, proxy advisers and retail investor groups. Cynics might argue the two-strikes rule has so far achieved little, other than costing boards huge time and effort to deal with the legislation.
For some companies that received a first strike on the remuneration report there may have been a good reason, such as aligning an executive’s pay to non-financial performance, such as safety results, which institutional investors did not favour. Others that have dominant shareholders may care little about the two-strikes rule, for there is no chance that 50 per cent or more of eligible votes will be cast to spill the board.
Two strikes round one
When you are 12 years. Com organizes niche social and the late. Disclaimer for a second one strike isn’t the realities and social and rules are meant to two strikes in the realities and in each ear. First implemented on and your continuous service three strikes rule.
unique nature of the two-strikes rule, its origins and effectiveness have not been examined to date and is therefore investigated in this research.
Over the past 12 months, however, a third, more amorphous, threat has been emerging in the Australian corporate arena — the for-profit shareholder activist. Shareholder class actions, like the professional shareholder activist, are a US-developed concept, first emerging in Australia at the beginning of this century. Since that time more than 30 have commenced, although uncertainty about the legal status of market-based reliance, difficult damages calculations and the financial burden of this complex litigation have so far precluded any from proceeding to final judgment.
All have been commercially resolved, many with a considerable payment by the company or its insurers to the plaintiffs. A significant boost was given to the developing practice in when the Australian High Court approved third party funding of class actions. Together these decisions prompted a surge in actions. Litigation funding bodies are now able to fund the expensive task of gathering evidence and targeting disgruntled shareholders as potential plaintiffs, often in tandem with plaintiff law firms who derive a large source of revenue from these claims.
Billabong International Limited is the latest high profile company to face a shareholder class action.
Banking royal commission: Ken Henry’s NAB faces strike at AGM
The four proposals are as follows:. ACSI includes 39 Australian and international asset owners and institutional investors advising its member funds on ESG issues and areas of board diversity and remuneration report recommendations. ACSI continues to advocate for pay policies to be submitted to a binding vote every 3 years supplementing the existing two strikes rule see HERE. The binding vote will require listed company KMP future pay practices to conform with a policy submitted every 3 years.
However there are some key differences between the UK and Australia which do not seem to have been fully considered:.
Here’s why I stopped giving second chances and why you should consider it too. That was then, though — now I operate by the one strike rule: you screw up, you’re out. Sponsored: The best dating/relationships advice on the web.
National Australia Bank chairman Ken Henry’s new executive pay plan faces a possible “first strike” at the bank’s annual meeting in December, he told the banking royal commission on Tuesday. But he defended shifting from share price to new, customer-related metrics to calculate bonuses and rejected criticism from Commonwealth Bank chairman Catherine Livingstone that the plan was overly focused on rewarding short-term performance. After a confident performance on Monday afternoon, Dr Henry was on the back foot on Tuesday, appearing flustered, providing defensive answers and equivocating at length when asked by senior counsel assisting Rowena Orr, QC, whether he and the board should have stepped in earlier to punish executives and send a message about expectations.
You know, at some point, obviously, we should have. Maybe , maybe , maybe Certainly by this year, ,” Dr Henry said. He acknowledged the three years spent dealing with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission over the fees for no service scandal was “absurd”. A core concern of the Hayne inquiry is that banker remuneration has created a culture of greed. It is considering whether changes to pay are needed to protect customers, but Dr Henry said on Tuesday it was uncertain whether this will be embraced by many shareholders who wanted to see the “capitalist model” maintained.
NAB announced in September that Dr Henry had revamped its senior executive pay plan, replacing short and long-term bonuses with a single incentive payment that takes more account of risk. He said on Tuesday executives viewed the long-term incentive as a “lottery ticket” because its hurdles were too demanding.
Two strikes rule – playing by the rules
A date isn’t a strikes interview, so try not to act like it is. Don’t interrogate your date, put them on the relationship, or make them feel like you’re judging them. Instead, try to listen to what they have to say and change whether their thoughts are compatible with yours. If you disagree with something your rule says, express your opinion. There’s no point of keeping quiet because you think it will make someone like you more. It is only guaranteed to make things worse down the road.
The two-strikes rule attempts to empower minority shareholders by a number of date and a negative abnormal return of % (%) over 12 months (2.
I used to believe that everyone deserved the benefit of a doubt. For me, this is the crux of the issue. So, why would you allow them to keep waltzing back in? Giving people a second chance often means they think they can walk all over you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Why would you do that? Their bad behavior shows you who they really are. Hanging out with scumbags is never a wise choice for a number of reasons. If the situation was switched around, they might not give you a second chance.
Most people I know have no problem wasting money once in a while — and why should they?